Management & Leadership Essay

The way the world straight off developed through the industrial transition from the twentieth century has a massive background with m both driving agent involved. The scheme that is cost- potent and has a safe(p) adjoin on social upbeat of society, and those living in the society, is considerably low-level on the effective and resourceful musical composition of presidencys of any lovings, which depends on satisfactory or discharge bylent wariness and leading potential, and which grass be learnt and extended, would be acknowledged by some.This is the reason varied brass and government agencies nation altogethery or internationally, placement of all kinds, investing in their own ontogeny, be pays as the basis of this belief that they pay back extensive investment in worry and lead training, development and education. in that location was a spread abroad in November 2006, Yahoo manager fix Garlinghouse issued memo that directly challenge the superior troub le. He acc utilise the Yahoos drawing cardship lacking strategical direction. Their contender Google had beaten Yahoo in toll of revenue, advertisement and the sh atomic number 18 price travel nearly a third since the cast down of the year. He suggested to concur a castrate in their strategy.Off course it is really difficult to change the strategy for any organization alone to survive in the competent world a change should be make when exigencyed. It was Mr. Garlinghouse great perplexity and lead skill that he diagnosed the paradox and gives his organization a direction to move. by from what he observed and analyzed, the chief(prenominal) lift off is that he made a finality to apply the change.He mogul have follow several(predicate) carriage for c atomic number 18 as well as leading, agree to the organizational structure of Yahoo, and would be awake of what extend to would be coming in applying the decisions. It would have been Autocratic or paternal or it might be the elected superstar but what actually he identified was the lack in the counselling and loss leading directions.Waka International is a international organization fashioning FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) all over the world and for the last a few(prenominal) years reservation its way up but non with a mistreat with which it has to moving over with approximate direction and leader but still the HR charge asked junior investigator to stack away a report on how the managers lavatory lead their team using divers(prenominal) styles of way and lead and how these styles going to impact on the strategic decision, and this is what slap-up organization do to look what changes they need or things that mountain be adopted wish well Yahoo manager Brad Galinghouse did. There is a good asseverateing by someone that there is one thing constant and it is change and researchers have made efforts to put forward some vestige what style we should adopt in op posite exit accompaniment within a team in Waka International to abide the challenges on different stages.Management is been depict as the process of setting objectives and making most efficient use of financial, gentlemans gentleman and physical resources to strain these objectives, in which main task include architectural planning, organizing, controlling and coordinating.The resources whitethorn include the organizational assets which may be people, machinery, raw materials, information, skills and financial capital to beatnik the organizational performance i.e. how efficiently and effectively counsel use these resources to satisfy nodes and to soon explore or examine management and in this report go away be looking on the management theories of both recent writers.First researcher tested to sketch the attempt of Peter Drucker for his field of study to describe and comment upon what managers do and he identifies trey tasksSatisfying the goals or legation of the organization. Enabling the fashioner to obtain and digest on productivity. Managing social responsibilities.He suggested in simplified manner that managers be needed to set objectives organize incite and turn over measure and develop people.Secondly to mention the influential go bad on on management of Henry Mintzberg in which he dilate his observations of what managers actually did. He examine that managers were non found to spend most of their measure planning, organizing, coordinating, commanding and controlling and suggested ten procedures managers oft quantify attempt logically in the quest of their objectives and divided these fibres in three stages as building relationship with the employees, yielding the flavour information and finally the allocation of decision making, objective and resources to the employees.On the other conk leadership sens be suggested as, the firearm of management to drive the organization to achieve its goals by utilizing potential fix with host efforts. leadership in the organizational role involves establishing and sharing a visual sensation, providing information, knowledge and methods to clear that vision so others stinker go along unbiddenly.If we link management and leadership we domiciliate say that leadership is an essential bit of effective management, which emphasis upon the building an purlieu in which every(prenominal)one has the opportunity to develop and excel skills. This link between management and leadership shows that managers must have traits of a leader. period acquisition or so leadership researcher describes two vitrines of leadership which are enjoin Leadership & Indirect Leadership. Direct leadership is something about imposing orders to your pursual and maybe enforcing them to accept you as a leader, where pursual used to see the leader on a regular basis face-to-face. Or it can be say that the leaders who are able to bulge to know those they are works with and influ ence them on an interpersonal basis are direct leaders.While those having thousands of pursuit without possessing the role of leadership is the indirect leadership. It may excessively be believed that the indirect leadership has to do with influencing others and making them your followers indirectly by inspiring the followers through your character, personal magnetism etc. Leadership is not about ruling people deal subjects and taking it for granted its about presenting yourself as someone who people think should be followed for guidance. Its about winning the minds and paddy wagon of people.If we like to differentiate between management and leadership we can come up with the idea that Managers perform roles in organizations and bring in a specific, formal title and match a role well Leaders aim to influence and guide others into prosecute quiticular objectives or ideas of the future and to motivate them into complimentsing to follow.In Waka International the management ha s the mitigate quality leadership thus the reason, management asked their junior staff for much(prenominal) an important take time off to look on it, since the organization is entrusting to move up and each management is leading its team in a good way, with a good pace as well, in a mend management and leadership style.Leadership style is the way in which the functions of leadership are carries out, the way in which the manager typically behaves towards members of the group.Different leaders have different behavior which might produce different effects, so researchers began studies on successful leaders and began to develop different styles of leadership. Also how to become a good leader one should be aware of his leadership style. There are many theories on leadership styles these are summarized into three dimensional theories which describe different leadership stylesThe concept in this style is of leader and followers, where leaders have got all the eminent power, author ity and control they make the decisions in a one way chat and direct their followers with minimal connection of followers. All the planning and thinking is do by the leader and the teams role is to follow the orders and motivation to the followers simply comes from the leaders status, charisma, expertise and power to reward and punish.An face of tyrannical styles is conjuring trick F. Kennedy and one of the many things that tush F. Kennedy is remembered for is his vision concerning the United States space program. On September 12, 1962, while speaking at Rice University, President Kennedy saidWe call for to go to the moon in this tenner and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to winHe whence went on to talk about coat alloys t hat had not yet been invented that are unfastened of standing heat and stresses several clips more than than have ever been experienced. He had a vision of sending a man to the moon and back safely. He even explained how it was going to be accomplished. John F. Kennedy was exhibiting an authoritative leadership style that mobilized the resources of an absolute nation towards this single goal.When we are talking about representative leadership, it does not list to a leader who holds political billet or background, such as senator or parliamentarian. It talks about a leadership style that exhibits democratic characteristics. This idea of leadership involves running a short letter on the basis on the majority of decisions i.e. leader encourage the involvement of employees to take part in decision.Many of the great organizational leaders did use this style, Bill render is well known for his democratic management style at Microsoft. He actively involved employees in key managem ent and strategic decisions. He was always interacted with the employees of Microsoft and customer and devoted his time for them by staying in contact via e-mail.In the democratic leadership style, we see a balance in the decision-making process. Employees or followers are allowed to participate in the decisions their opinion counts still as much as the leaders. at one time this might sound like the best way to lead but every ways got some pros and cons in it.In this type of leadership managers observes that employees are working well on their own and consciously make a decision to pass to the member to allow them freedom of operation and not to interfere and is always getable to help in need. The leader may besides set some example but nobody has to follow it if they want to. They leader dont attack to motivate their subordinate or it can be said that motivation only comes from the fact that the individuals are free to do what they likes and no one has to waste time explain ing their actions. This leadership style may work with individual people like academics and artists who need to be free on work in their own way, and dont like teamwork, they would like to like what they want, and not ask for guidance or permission.Researchers suggested that a specific leadership style cannot be constraint to a crabby billet rather any styles can be adopted at any situations. Researchers also suggested that the autocratic style may be suitable when large numbers of un-skilled employees are involved and when quick decisions are a matter of life and death and have to be made quickly. Motivation is just a name which comes out from the personality of the leader that is the reason followers pare to please or satisfy the leaders. So this style may be adopted when there is a need of prodding in Waka International and when a particular objective is achieved a different style can be implemented, and this is what management is all about, the change.Since in the democrati c style, employees or followers have an equal say in the decision-making process, they are more employ to the desired outcome. The collaborative environment created by this style a lot results in more comprehensive solutions to problems. If Waka International is looking for better and long term result democratic style would be a better choice as most of the known company focus on the democratic style so it would be blue-chip for long term objectives and goals.Laissez-faire type of leader may inspire or motivate people or plan ideas but do not make any efforts to ensure that the team follows it. This kind of leadership can only work with academics or artists, who dont like team work and emphasis to work freely. So many researchers dont suggest adopting this style of leadership and it will not be driving the organization to its objective quickly. But this style is has good result if professional and experienced followers are in the workplace.From the report it can be concluded tha t management and leadership are two different aspects, but on a broad vision if leadership has not become the part of the management, this may lead to disastrous result. grapple up the resources and not leading in a good direction without an effective leadership may show short-run good result but it would not demonstrate a good impact on the organizational objective or goals and without the right leadership, organizational strategies will reside as ink on paper. acquire the right leadership to implement dividing line strategies takes careful planning and dedicated effort, and often substantial investment.Like the sports coach whose fair(a) team never wins a championship, the chief executive officer cant hope to achieve bold new strategies without giving fantasy to his leadership team and leadership culture. besides many organizations have become freewheeling with their existing leadership programs, instead of making certain that they are linking their leadership strategies and development investments with their business strategies and taking full utility of the learning opportunities that accompany strategic change.With learning and research it can also be concluded that the planning methods are useable in meeting the challenges of any situation and developing leadership skills. Leadership traits can be learnt and developed to meet the strategic needs. This report has the relevance for handling obscure situation of the present competitive business world by utilizing leadership skills in making strategic decisions to achieve the stipulated goal. The different styles mentioned earlier can be used depending upon the organizational needs and objectives, to achieve the goals.